Skip to main content

In Defense of Toshio Tamogami


Toshio Tamogami ( legitimate Japanese )
Tobias Harris ( ?)



How is the legality of the European empires any different than the legality of Japan's colonies in Northeast Asia? If anything, the European empires were more secure in their rights in their colonies than Japan was in its colonies, seeing as how it acquired both by coercing the governments of China and Korea. The Dutch had ruled the Dutch East Indies directly for more than two centuries. India had been directly ruled by the British empire for nearly a century at the time of the war. The French had ruled Indochina directly for nearly as long as the British ruled India. In short, international law didn't apply; a Japanese attack on these colonies was legally indistinguishable from an attack on the French or British homelands. And one may recall that Japan did in fact attack these colonies, a fact unmentioned in connection with this argument, meaning ipso facto Japan was an aggressor in the war.





The legality of the European empires? More secure in their rights in their colonies!? Whose rights are you referring to, the people that were oppressed and colonized by Western nations? Japan wasn't a "white" nation, so of course it didn’t fall under the white rule of law( international law is a misnomer). Did not Western empires acquire colonies through coercion and force? This is the point that Tamogami was making in his first paragraph in his words, not your spin Toby. You speak as if Western expansionist policies through colonial rule was legitimate, because they had a firmer grip on the people they were oppressing, and Japan's wasn't. Maybe if Japan had colonized Korea and China for centuries their occupation would’ve been considered “their right?” Even in China today there is evidence of Western aggression by English forces lead by Earl of Elgin.



In 1898 Germany seized Kiau Chau in China. Britain responded by seizing Wei-hai-wei, and the next year the Russians took possession of Port Arthur. A flame of hatred for the Europeans swept through China. There were massacres of Europeans and Christian converts, and in 1900 an attack upon and siege of the European legations in Pekin. A combined force of Europeans made a punitive expedition to Pekin, rescued the legations, and stole an enormous amount of valuable property. The Russians then seized Manchuria, and in 1904 the British invaded. Your Western powers were busy carving up other asian country’s for your own gain with no regard for anything, anybody, or anyone. From 1931-1937 Japan was the aggressor, but in the case of Western powers they had centuries of aggression and oppression against non-white nations in the world, and because Western aggression was more established their legitimacy was more “right?”



What difference does it make whether one colony was more secured than the other? Japan's colonies weren't secured enough to be considered a legitimate colonial power? That's an out right lie since it was Japan that built infrastructure and schools and roads in Korea and educated many of those people. Maybe Japan didn't have centuries of experience in slavery and brutality through colonization as Western nations did, but to paint Japan’s history as one of wars and aggression is wrong, especially when Western powers try to justify theirs with Western law.



Western powers grew their wealth off the backs of free slave labor for centuries, Japan was merely copying what these expansionist Western nations were doing at the time. That doesn’t make them the worst of all evil, and it certainly doesn’t make them the poster child of a bad nation either. I am sick and tired of academics like you who find anything and everything wrong with Japan’s wartime past.

In short, international law didn't apply; a Japanese attack on these colonies was legally indistinguishable from an attack on the French or British homelands. And one may recall that Japan did in fact attack these colonies, a fact unmentioned in connection with this argument, meaning ipso facto Japan was an aggressor in the war



Again, there was no such thing as international law back then, there were only rich Western expansionist rules labeled as "international law" which were exclusively dictated and prosecuted by colonizers of Caucasian extraction. Now, whether you say so- called " international law" didn't apply is left up to interpretation. Japan didn't attack Korea and China in the same way Hitler marched on Poland and France, or the way Napoleon bombed the shores of Haiti and murdered its people, or the way the native Americans were exterminated on their own soil. What about the crown of England, how much blood is on her hands for their aggression through-out Africa and the colonies of North America? Laws didn’t apply to these incidences either, right? But whenever topics of reparations come up then all of a sudden laws are invented to justify not paying back the people Western nations have so arrogantly oppressed for centuries.



Japan didn't put in place extermination protocols in order to wipe out an entire race of people, Hitler did, and other European nations followed similar models of eradication through different means and through different methods, which makes Western nations no different than Japan at that time. Here is one instance where a group of people were targeted for unethical experiments based on race in North America. Some may refer to this as the Tuskegee Syphilis experiment. Even lynching laws which largely targeted a specific race of people was deemed legal even from America’s highest court. These laws were largely put in place to control and contain a specific race of people with the sole purpose of weakening their will to resist.



Japan had done similar experiments on the Chinese for research purposes too, there are faults on both sides here. Dr. Ishii , the head physician of these experiments, was protected by the United States even after the war. Why he was spared criminal prosecution? I don’t know.
Moreover, instances where Western colonizers had similar protocols as Hitler through-out the continent of Africa and North America were evident in the systematic murder, castrations and the torture of thousands of slaves for centuries and then building your vast empires off the backs of free slave labor. You didn't educate those slaves to make them self reliant, you didn’t incorporate them into your societies and governments, you excluded them and kept them ignorant, poor, and dependent on you and your institutions – Jim Crow.



Japan did incorporate Chinese and Korean sympathizers into its larger scheme. There were Korean kamikaze pilots who fought for the emperor, and who are honored still to this day at Yasukuni Shrine, and that included quite a few Chinese soldiers there as well! But of course you wouldn't know that Toby. In Hitler’s Germany African American soldiers who fought on the Beaches of Normandy were still treated as second class citizens even after Germany was defeated. German P.O.W.s were given higher status than African American soldiers, even in chow lines. AA soldiers were second after the German P.O.W’s (America’s enemy).



Both China and Japan's Emperor were very close and shared many common ideals and even bonded on major issues of that time. These two countries weren’t the de facto enemies like you portray them to be. China was in utter ruins because of idiots like Chiank-kai shek and Mao Tsedong's and his private cultural revolutionary policies which cost the lives of millions of his own people. How dare you attack Japan with your inaccuracy's Toby. You are trying to differentiate Western expansionist policies(aggression) from so-called Japanese aggression!? There is no difference between the two evils, just your arrogance and bias at play.



You live and work here and attack these people with your commentary at the same time.

Popular posts from this blog

Shin-Okubo: Little Korea

So I finally got around to going up there to Shin-Okubo,  the land of Seoul via the Yamanote Line.  Been putting this trip off for years for personal reasons;  I am not a fan of Hanlleyu.      I knew why I came up this way, and for none other reason than the food, and maybe to bask in the nausea of Korean romanticist who steal Japanese Jukujo's souls.    But honestly, I like spicy food and stews and pickled vegetables that challenge my taste buds.    I also love the little funky cafes that line the main thoroughfares and alley ways, each with their own little eclectic menus and interior decor.     This place is Korea.  





Shin-Okuba represents more than just a place to relish in Korean culinary delights and K-pop culture, but a place where Koreans can express themselves through their culture.    You can feel the local vibe in the air as you're walking down narrow walkways and footpaths.    I have personally been to mainland Korea six times, so a lot of the nostalgia was there …

August: The Return of Souls

August is peak summer season in Japan.  We can look forward to some of the most spectacular fireworks displays and festivals in the world, especially  in places like Tohoku and Kanto regions.  August is also  the most contentious month of the year in Japan; with the end of the war and war-related guilt.    Then there's the great exodus back home for millions of Japanese.   Obon season is what it's called in Japan, and it's  where families return to their hometowns to remember their ancestors and to spend time with loved ones.  Gravestones are visited, cleaned, and washed; rice or alcohol is often placed on  miniature altars next to a  headstone.  This is a way for Japanese to reconnect with their roots; a way for them to stay grounded and founded in the ways of tradition and cultural protocol.   

For the foreign tourist, some places will be overcrowded and expensive to reach; for Japanese, this is normal and can't be helped.   Wherever you go there will be lines and h…

Japan Board of Education: Amazing Grace...?

Japan Board of Education Textbook.
Amazing Grace
Shuken Shuppan  Polestar textbook English Communication

Preface:  Japanese / Japan is  one of the leading donors in humanitarian aid around the world.   They have donated billions of yen to charities, developing countries, and startup business to just about every country on the globe.  Some Japanese have even taken matters to the extreme  to the point of poking their noses into hotspot areas like Palestine and Isreal, things the Japanese may want to avoid.  Had Japan shared its borders with an ethnic minority with its own government, the relative peace and calm of this country would be questionable.   No other country can be like nor emulate Japan.   So, where does this spirit of charity and altruism come from exactly?   Why do the Japanese feel they need to save the whole world, while caring very little for its own people?   It's the Board of Education...?  The essay below is one such example of what Japanese kids learn in school,…